ClubClub profile · all grades, all covered seasons (archive and PlayHQ)

FOUNDING YEAR AND HOME VENUE NOT PUBLISHED

Cheerio Netball Club

Current rank #15 · best finish #3 in 2010

543
championship points, all seasons
2
grade ladders topped
34.8%
win rate across all grades
672
games played

Club strength by season

Line chart of Cheerio Netball Club, all grades: club strength on a fixed axis from 0.00 to 1.00, where 1.00 is top of every grade, with teams fielded shown beneath. The line breaks across seasons with no data. 20 of 20 covered seasons have a measured strength.

  • 2000: strength 0.433 from 22 teams.
  • 2001: strength 0.395 from 22 teams.
  • 2002: strength 0.285 from 18 teams.
  • 2003: strength 0.418 from 19 teams.
  • 2004: strength 0.354 from 17 teams.
  • 2005: strength 0.445 from 16 teams.
  • 2006: strength 0.403 from 17 teams.
  • 2007: strength 0.519 from 17 teams.
  • 2008: strength 0.527 from 19 teams.
  • 2009: strength 0.532 from 19 teams.
  • 2010: strength 0.540 from 20 teams.
  • 2011: strength 0.584 from 17 teams.
  • 2012: strength 0.482 from 15 teams.
  • 2013: strength 0.456 from 14 teams.
  • 2014: strength 0.381 from 16 teams.
  • No season data for 2015.
  • 2016: strength 0.436 from 13 teams.
  • No season data for 2017–2021.
  • 2022: strength 0.287 from 9 teams.
  • 2023: strength 0.191 from 11 teams.
  • 2024: strength 0.442 from 8 teams.
  • 2025: strength 0.336 from 10 teams.

Strength is the club’s average finishing position across every grade it fields, where 1.00 is top of the grade. It ignores how many teams a club fields, so it answers “are our teams doing better?” — unlike the championship ranking, which rewards depth as well as performance.

Strength by grade band

Strongest band first. Every sparkline uses the same 0.00–1.00 axis, so bands can be compared against each other, and the line breaks across seasons the club fielded nothing in that band.

  • AMND League0.444

    Cheerio Netball Club in AMND League: strength 0.444 in 2016 from 1 team. Up 0.418 on its first three measured seasons, across 16 measured seasons.

  • A. Grade0.000

    Cheerio Netball Club in A. Grade: strength 0.000 in 2023 from 1 team. Down 0.519 on its first three measured seasons, across 18 measured seasons.

  • B0.071

    Cheerio Netball Club in B: strength 0.071 in 2025 from 2 teams. Down 0.102 on its first three measured seasons, across 20 measured seasons.

  • Inter.0.571

    Cheerio Netball Club in Inter.: strength 0.571 in 2025 from 1 team. Down 0.095 on its first three measured seasons, across 20 measured seasons.

  • C0.222

    Cheerio Netball Club in C: strength 0.222 in 2016 from 1 team. Down 0.242 on its first three measured seasons, across 14 measured seasons.

  • Junior0.000

    Cheerio Netball Club in Junior: strength 0.000 in 2025 from 2 teams. Down 0.264 on its first three measured seasons, across 20 measured seasons.

  • Sub-Junior0.738

    Cheerio Netball Club in Sub-Junior: strength 0.738 in 2025 from 3 teams. Up 0.164 on its first three measured seasons, across 20 measured seasons.

  • Primary0.214

    Cheerio Netball Club in Primary: strength 0.214 in 2025 from 2 teams. Up 0.123 on its first three measured seasons, across 20 measured seasons.

Championship points by season

Bars take the club colour for a top-three finish. A dashed slot means the season is not ranked yet.

  • 2000: 39.2 championship points, ranked 5.
  • 2001: 37.0 championship points, ranked 8.
  • 2002: 24.6 championship points, ranked 10.
  • 2003: 31.0 championship points, ranked 8.
  • 2004: 25.8 championship points, ranked 9.
  • 2005: 32.2 championship points, ranked 9.
  • 2006: 30.8 championship points, ranked 8.
  • 2007: 32.9 championship points, ranked 8.
  • 2008: 36.0 championship points, ranked 4.
  • 2009: 32.6 championship points, ranked 5.
  • 2010: 42.3 championship points, ranked 3.
  • 2011: 39.7 championship points, ranked 7.
  • 2012: 29.5 championship points, ranked 9.
  • 2013: 29.5 championship points, ranked 9.
  • 2014: 27.0 championship points, ranked 9.
  • No season data for 2015.
  • 2016: 20.5 championship points, ranked 13.
  • No season data for 2017–2021.
  • 2022: 8.6 championship points, ranked 16.
  • 2023: 6.7 championship points, ranked 15.
  • 2024: 8.1 championship points, ranked 15.
  • 2025: 9.4 championship points, ranked 15.
  • 2026: not ranked yet.

Most-played opponents

From fixture-level results, which cover 2025 onwards. Earlier seasons are held as ladders, so they contribute no meetings here.

Season by season, grade by grade

Every graded finish for Cheerio Netball Club
COMPETITIONGOAL %
2026B3Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division7 of 95–7–191.5%
2026B4 BAdelaide Metropolitan Netball Division5 of 63–10–280.1%
2026C1Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division10 of 102–1350.5%
2026Junior 7Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division2 of 78–2136.4%
2026Junior 8Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division6 of 82–933.8%
2026Junior 8Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division2 of 88–2179.4%
2026Primary 5Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division5 of 64–6–1102.9%
2026Primary 6Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division1 of 811–0260.0%
2026Primary 7AAdelaide Metropolitan Netball Division3 of 86–4114.6%
2026Primary 7AAdelaide Metropolitan Netball Division5 of 85–666.7%
2026Sub Junior 5AAdelaide Metropolitan Netball Division5 of 85–6118.5%
2026Sub Junior 8Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division2 of 68–2160.5%
2025B3Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division7 of 84–1468.7%
2025B4Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division8 of 82–1666.7%
2025INTER 6Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division4 of 88–6123.8%
2025Junior 6Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division8 of 81–1338.2%
2025Junior 8Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division8 of 82–1238.0%
2025Primary 4Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division5 of 86–880.5%
2025Primary 5BAdelaide Metropolitan Netball Division8 of 81–135.9%
2025Sub Junior 6AAdelaide Metropolitan Netball Division2 of 810–4190.2%
2025Sub Junior 7Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division2 of 812–2171.5%
2025Sub Junior 8Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division4 of 76–690.2%
2024B2 (source note: Upstream data inconsistency: played=17 but won+drawn+lost=16 (won=5, drawn=0, lost=11). Imported unchanged from source.)Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division5 of 85–1179.4%
2024INTER 5Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division6 of 74–9–176.1%
2024Junior 7Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division8 of 83–1169.3%
2024Primary 5BAdelaide Metropolitan Netball Division1 of 610–3–1144.8%
2024Primary 7Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division6 of 84–1054.8%
2024Sub Junior 6BAdelaide Metropolitan Netball Division2 of 610–3–1137.1%
2024Sub Junior 8Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division3 of 87–7113.9%
2024Sub Junior 8Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division7 of 81–12–126.4%
2023A GRADEAdelaide Metropolitan Netball Division10 of 100–1841.9%
2023B4Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division8 of 81–1365.7%
2023INTER 4Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division7 of 83–10–180.3%
2023INTER 6Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division7 of 70–430.1%
2023Junior 7Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division5 of 64–1169.8%
2023Primary 3Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division8 of 82–1238.5%
2023Primary 4Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division4 of 77–673.7%
2023Primary 4Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division7 of 71–1223.7%
2023Primary 6Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division4 of 67–866.7%
2023Sub Junior 5Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division6 of 83–1155.3%
2023Sub Junior 8Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division4 of 88–685.3%
2022A GRADEAdelaide Metropolitan Netball Division9 of 103–1581.7%
2022B4Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division7 of 82–15–175.4%
2022B5Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division7 of 83–14–153.1%
2022INTER 5Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division4 of 87–798.9%
2022Junior 7Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division7 of 72–1055.0%
2022Primary 5Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division7 of 84–1061.1%
2022Primary 6Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division2 of 88–2202.1%
2022Primary 6Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division6 of 82–851.1%
2022Sub Junior 6Adelaide Metropolitan Netball Division5 of 74–7–197.9%